[sbopkg-discuss] Re: Terminals needing refreshing to see sbopkg

[Phillip Warner]

Agreed.  It would add too much clutter.  The short script should work fine.

Thank you.

--phillip

On 2/16/09, Mauro Giachero <mauro.giachero at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Phillip Warner
> <phillip.c.warner at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2/11/09, Mauro Giachero <mauro.giachero at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > After a bit of googling I found [1], and I verified that sending a
>> SIGWINCH
>> > to the dialog process makes the dialog appear.
>> > I'm not sure whether working around it on the sbopkg side is feasible,
>> > though.
>> I just tested this and I think that this could be done in sbopkg if
>> the 'dialog --clear' statements do not work.
>>
>> For example, something like this may work.
>>  exec dialog_process &
>>  dpid=$!
>>  .
>>  .
>>  .
>>  kill -SIGWINCH $dpid
>>
>> --phillip
>>
>
> Of course, but that would clutter the code really too much!
> What if, instead, you use the attached script to start sbopkg? Quickly
> tested here in aterm, and seems to work.
> (I agree that's dirty and suboptimal, but makes sbopkg usable in aterm and I
> don't see huge downsides...)
>
> --
> Mauro Giachero
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sbopkg-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to sbopkg-discuss at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sbopkg-discuss+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sbopkg-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---