[sbopkg-discuss] Re: Terminals needing refreshing to see sbopkg

[Mauro Giachero]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Phillip Warner
<phillip.c.warner at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On 2/11/09, Mauro Giachero <mauro.giachero at gmail.com> wrote:
> > After a bit of googling I found [1], and I verified that sending a
> SIGWINCH
> > to the dialog process makes the dialog appear.
> > I'm not sure whether working around it on the sbopkg side is feasible,
> > though.
> I just tested this and I think that this could be done in sbopkg if
> the 'dialog --clear' statements do not work.
>
> For example, something like this may work.
>  exec dialog_process &
>  dpid=$!
>  .
>  .
>  .
>  kill -SIGWINCH $dpid
>
> --phillip
>

Of course, but that would clutter the code really too much!
What if, instead, you use the attached script to start sbopkg? Quickly
tested here in aterm, and seems to work.
(I agree that's dirty and suboptimal, but makes sbopkg usable in aterm and I
don't see huge downsides...)

-- 
Mauro Giachero

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sbopkg-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to sbopkg-discuss at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sbopkg-discuss+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sbopkg-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20090216/546b57c5/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sbopkg-rxvt
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 185 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20090216/546b57c5/attachment.obj>