[sbopkg-users] Feature proposal

[Robby Workman]

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:52:43 -0500
alkos333 <me at alkos333.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Mauro Giachero wrote:
> > Anyway, why a single queue? I think storing one queue per
> > (relevant) package would be far more flexible, given that sbopkg
> > makes loading and merging multiple queue files really easy. And of
> > course, somebody could also build up a queue archive.
>
> I know it' snot as easy as it looks, but it's doable.  One file
> because I don't have to worry about merging them and running several
> files.  I can just load one and tell it to run through the entire
> thing.  Works like a charm here :)
> 


Maybe I'm not fully understanding the goal here, but what if sbopkg
were able to treat a queue as a package?  IOW, you would be able to do
something like this:

queue_all=queue1,queue2,queue3,...

-RW
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20090416/d72381b9/attachment-0001.asc>