From sbop.echo.towerboy at xoxy.net Mon Oct 1 03:37:55 2012 From: sbop.echo.towerboy at xoxy.net (sbop.echo.towerboy at xoxy.net) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:37:55 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] GPG Check Failure Message-ID: <50691013.7080008@gmail.com> First of all, thanks for creating and maintaining sbopkg. Although it's easy to find and install software found on Slackbuilds.org, this makes it even easier. I started using sbopkg on a laptop with the 32-bit version of Slackware 13.37. It works fine there. I wanted to use it on a new installation of 64-bit Slackware 13.37 on a desktop PC, and I do not have the 32-bit libraries installed. Instead of just copying over the 32-bit packages and installing them, I copied over /var/cache/sbopkg and /var/lib/sbopkg after installing the sbopkg 0.35.0 (if memory serves; the latest from 2011, anyway) package on the new PC. I created one tar.gz file of /var/log/packages, since it was about 115MB, so I actually "untarred" it on the new installation. When I try to compile packages I've put in the sbopkg queue on the new PC, though, I get an error of "GPG Check Failed!" and several options to do what I thought was quit. It appears, however, that selecting "Yes" to keep the files lets the compilation continue to a successful completion, although I have yet to actually run any of the programs I've compiled. Does anyone know why the GPG check fails? It does not fail on the laptop with the original installation of sbopkg, and which I synchronize with on-line repositories. -- Sincerely, Chick Tower From slakmagik at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 03:28:17 2012 From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 23:28:17 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] Sbopkg 0.36.0 Released Message-ID: <20121004032816.GA12004@devbox> Greetings, all. This release is ready to use with Slackware 14 and includes a trio of new features, and a trio of modifications. Thanks to everyone who helped. Congrats to Pat, et al., on the new Slackware. sbopkg 0.36.0 (2012-10-04 03:05 UTC) FEATURES * This release of sbopkg is Slackware 14.0-ready. (Congrats to all involved in the Slackware release.) * Sbopkg now has a -d flag which can download without building or installing, in addition to -b (download, build) and -i (download, build, install). Thanks to Kristoffer Karlsson for the feature request and some testing and to Mauro Giachero for the initial patch and discussion and review of additional patching. * It is now possible to combine the -r flag with other flags such that a sync is performed first. For example 'sbopkg -ri foo' will synchronize with the repo and install the latest foo. * There is a new configuration option, NICE, which enables the user to specify a niceness for the execution of the SlackBuild. Previously, this was hardcoded to 10 (which is still the default). Thanks to Joni Martikainen for the suggestion. MODIFICATIONS * Specifying an alternate directory as repository root from the command line, which was done with the -d flag, is now done with the -D flag. Sorry for any inconvenience. * The 'Build' option in a package's info menu has been renamed to 'Process', along with many other minor informational changes throughout the UI. * The Slamd64 repo file has been removed as that project is defunct. From slakmagik at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 04:33:51 2012 From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 00:33:51 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] GPG Check Failure In-Reply-To: <50691013.7080008@gmail.com> References: <50691013.7080008@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20121004043351.GA12909@devbox> On 2012-09-30 (Sun) 23:37:55 [-0400], sbop.echo.towerboy at xoxy.net wrote: > First of all, thanks for creating and maintaining sbopkg. Although it's > easy to find and install software found on Slackbuilds.org, this makes > it even easier. > Speaking for Chess and Mauro, you're welcome - glad you like it. > I started using sbopkg on a laptop with the 32-bit version of Slackware > 13.37. It works fine there. I wanted to use it on a new installation > of 64-bit Slackware 13.37 on a desktop PC, and I do not have the 32-bit > libraries installed. Instead of just copying over the 32-bit packages > and installing them, I copied over /var/cache/sbopkg and /var/lib/sbopkg > after installing the sbopkg 0.35.0 (if memory serves; the latest from > 2011, anyway) package on the new PC. I created one tar.gz file of > /var/log/packages, since it was about 115MB, so I actually "untarred" it > on the new installation. When I try to compile packages I've put in the > sbopkg queue on the new PC, though, I get an error of "GPG Check > Failed!" and several options to do what I thought was quit. It appears, > however, that selecting "Yes" to keep the files lets the compilation > continue to a successful completion, although I have yet to actually run > any of the programs I've compiled. > > Does anyone know why the GPG check fails? It does not fail on the > laptop with the original installation of sbopkg, and which I synchronize > with on-line repositories. Have you tried manually checking the files? IOW, does the GPG check fail only within sbopkg or altogether? Because, if it isn't a configuration problem with gpg on your new system, I'm stumped - anything I think of has an equal reason for why it couldn't be that. And, if it is in sbopkg, could you send me a package list of what exactly you installed and which ones failed? Is it still continuing to fail with additional packages? And have you tried moving over the old repo and re-syncing? Also, while it shouldn't matter, there's a new sbopkg 0.36.0 out - do you still have problems running that version? From sbop.echo.towerboy at xoxy.net Thu Oct 4 18:04:17 2012 From: sbop.echo.towerboy at xoxy.net (sbop.echo.towerboy at xoxy.net) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:04:17 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] GPG Check Failure In-Reply-To: <20121004043351.GA12909@devbox> References: <50691013.7080008@gmail.com> <20121004043351.GA12909@devbox> Message-ID: <506DCFA1.3070603@gmail.com> On 10/04/2012 12:33 AM, slakmagik - slakmagik at gmail.com wrote: > Have you tried manually checking the files? IOW, does the GPG check fail > only within sbopkg or altogether? Because, if it isn't a configuration > problem with gpg on your new system, I'm stumped - anything I think of > has an equal reason for why it couldn't be that. And, if it is in > sbopkg, could you send me a package list of what exactly you installed > and which ones failed? Is it still continuing to fail with additional > packages? And have you tried moving over the old repo and re-syncing? > > Also, while it shouldn't matter, there's a new sbopkg 0.36.0 out - do > you still have problems running that version? > When I manually check the signatures of the files ( with "gpg --verify", as root) gpg says it can't check the signature because the public key does not exist. I don't recall configuring gnupg before when I first used sbopkg on my laptop, but maybe I simply forgot I did something. I do notice that /root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg exists on my desktop PC, but it has zero bytes. On my laptop, I do have the Slackbuilds.org public key installed. Does sbopkg get this key when it syncs with a remote repository? I did copy /var/lib/sbopkg and /var/cache/sbopkg from my laptop to my desktop. That's because I plan to keep the laptop up-to-date with sbopkg, when I'm connected to a wi-fi network, and copy changes to my desktop. I have dial-up internet access at home, so it might take a while to update things there, plus I don't have the modem configured yet (awaiting a serial port), so it's not even possible yet. It'll be a while until I can verify if the problem exists with sbopkg 0.36.0. I expect it will, if I don't get gpg configured properly. Chick From thedoogster at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 16:41:02 2012 From: thedoogster at gmail.com (Doogster) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:41:02 -0700 Subject: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg-slackware-queues merge request opened Message-ID: Heads up: I've issued a merge request for my clone of the sbopkg-slackware-queues git repo. Direct link to the request: https://gitorious.org/sbopkg-slackware-queues/sbopkg-slackware-queues/merge_requests/1 I think I've documented everything in the merge request itself, but the changes that would be merged are: * references to haskell-deepseq removed (it's no longer on SBo) * references to GConf removed (it's part of Slackware now and no longer on SBo) * haskell-random added to xmonad-contrib queue * haskell-text added to the haskell-parsec queue From slakmagik at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 18:58:45 2012 From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:58:45 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line) Message-ID: <20121005185845.GA21782@devbox> Because it wasn't a change in sbopkg itself, I forgot to include a note in the NEWS file about the new REQUIRES line in the .info file. Sbopkg has long provided the ability to use queuefiles and that doesn't change, so users are free to generate queues using the new .info info. Perhaps the gitorious queuefile repo will make use of this. Sbopkg has also long provided access to both the README and the .info files either from the command line or the dialog UI. Unfortunately, at least for now, the user will have to start using that capability of looking at the .info file in addition to the README to get all the information since the dependency data has been removed from the README. Thanks to elesmod in #sbopkg for reminding me of this. From mfilpot at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 18:53:59 2012 From: mfilpot at gmail.com (Matthew Fillpot) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:53:59 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] new .info formats and queue repo Message-ID: I am a user of sbopkg and the queue repo. I would like to know if the newest version of sbopkg is built to handle the dependencies from the info files and if the repo will be updated to only include optional dependencies. -- -Thank You, -Matthew Fillpot -Slackware Documentation Project - Staff Editor - http://docs.slackware.com/wiki:user:mfillpot -Linux.com - Moderator - https://www.linux.com/forums/person/198 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From slakmagik at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 20:10:51 2012 From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 16:10:51 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] new .info formats and queue repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20121005201051.GA23043@devbox> On 2012-10-05 (Fri) 14:53:59 [-0400], Matthew Fillpot wrote: > I am a user of sbopkg and the queue repo. I would like to know if the > newest version of sbopkg is built to handle the dependencies from the info > files and if the repo will be updated to only include optional dependencies. > I think we might have crossed in the mail. http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/2012-October/000600.html Basically, sbopkg never has handled dependencies and still doesn't but works the same as always in that regard. It's the queufiles that handle the deps and that's up to the users or the queufiles they find produced by others. As far as the repo, if you mean Mauro's gitorious repo, I'll leave that to him to answer as I don't know. From phillip.c.warner at gmail.com Sat Oct 6 00:43:34 2012 From: phillip.c.warner at gmail.com (Phillip Warner) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:43:34 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line) In-Reply-To: <20121005185845.GA21782@devbox> References: <20121005185845.GA21782@devbox> Message-ID: You could potentially add a new option to sbopkg to generate a queue on the fly by recursively making use of the REQUIRES in the .info file of the selected SlackBuild and its respective required SlackBuilds and so on. I wouldn't recommend building directly from this. Rather the queue would have to be processed as they are now. In the GUI a "Generate queue" option could be in the menu while viewing any SlackBuild. The cli could use maybe a 'Q' and a filename to save the queue to. --phillip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From slakmagik at gmail.com Sat Oct 6 02:26:26 2012 From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 22:26:26 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] [Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line) In-Reply-To: <20121006014927.GA902@gmail.com> References: <20121005185845.GA21782@devbox> <1349484072.52797.YahooMailNeo@web142306.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121006014927.GA902@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20121006022626.GA27653@devbox> On 2012-10-06 (Sat) 08:49:27 [+0700], Binh Nguyen wrote: > On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:41:12 -0700 > Phillip Warner wrote: > > > You could potentially add a new option to sbopkg to generate a queue > > on the fly by recursively making use of the REQUIRES in the .info file > > of the selected SlackBuild and its respective required slackBuilds and > > so on.? I wouldn't recommend building directly from this.? Rather the > > queue would have to be processed as they are now.? In the GUI a > > "Generate queue" option could be in the menu while viewing any > > SlackBuild.? The cli could use maybe a 'Q' and a filename to save the > > queue to. > > > > --phillip > > > If you look at the syntax of sbopkg queuefiles, it's not just simply a > list of dependencies but ON/OFF flags, dep options, etc. So we cannot > just utilize REQUIRES like that but some modifications are needed. > > Ideally, I think Mauro Giachero's queuefiles git repo should be > maintained in parallel with slackbuilds.org git repo. It would only be > updated when new SlackBuilds be added though. With the new REQUIRES, > maintaining a repo like that would not be so difficult as before I > believe. > > -- Binh 1st, I just sent the initial mail on this to both lists because it was following up on the release announcement (I should have actually posted both my 'oops' mails as actual follow-ups to it - sorry about that) but I don't want to clutter the slackbuilds list with any more sbopkg-specific stuff than I already have. ;) If there's any more discussion I'd direct it solely to the sbopkg list. As far as the deps, that's kind of the third rail for me. Slackware == no-dep-handling. I have no interest in putting anything into the core sbopkg that handles deps or generates queue files or whatever. It processes them, but that's it. So I think Binh's correct - it should make it easier for Mauro to generate his queuefile repo or for others to do so if he's not still doing it but that's about it and doesn't concern sbopkg. I get that the new line enables the SBo website to do neat stuff with the hyperlinks and all and it probably makes it easier for the admins to check/maintain the dep list but I think those should be the primary uses of the field. From mauro.giachero at gmail.com Wed Oct 10 16:35:36 2012 From: mauro.giachero at gmail.com (Mauro Giachero) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:35:36 +0200 Subject: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg-slackware-queues merge request opened In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you. When I received your pull request I was right in the middle of a rewrite of the repository (pushed minutes ago). I verified that the changes you asked me to pull were already included in what I was going to release, and they are. Consider this as pulled ? I'm not doing the actual pull just because it?s not going to change any queue now but it gives a load of conflicts. Again, thank you for your work -- Mauro Giachero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mauro.giachero at gmail.com Wed Oct 10 17:11:59 2012 From: mauro.giachero at gmail.com (Mauro Giachero) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:11:59 +0200 Subject: [sbopkg-users] new .info formats and queue repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Matthew Fillpot wrote: > I am a user of sbopkg and the queue repo. I would like to know if the > newest version of sbopkg is built to handle the dependencies from the info > files and if the repo will be updated to only include optional dependencies. > Hi, I just updated my queue repository with queues generated using the REQUIRES directive (so queues only include required dependencies). > -- > -Thank You, > -Matthew Fillpot > Bye -- Mauro Giachero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mfilpot at gmail.com Thu Oct 11 00:56:52 2012 From: mfilpot at gmail.com (Matthew Fillpot) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:56:52 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] [Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line) In-Reply-To: References: <20121005185845.GA21782@devbox> <1349484072.52797.YahooMailNeo@web142306.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121006014927.GA902@gmail.com> <20121006022626.GA27653@devbox> <20121008113454.cj7f898w0wsoog88@webmail.oulu.fi> <20121008220314.GA2486@devbox> Message-ID: On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Mauro Giachero wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm not going to enter the "Slackware vs Dependencies" battle, but I'm > sorry that there's the impression that "sbopkg developers don't care". Even > through I'm not actively working on sbopkg I *do* care about users, and I'm > sure slakmagik and Chess do, too. > My experience with sbopkg is that adding features is never as easy and > painless as it seems before starting (taking the maintenance efforts in the > picture, of course), so I can't really blame slakmagik if he isn't willing > to develop and/or maintain a feature he thinks shouldn't be there in the > first place. > > Given that it's not a good time for me to work on sbopkg (I have no > Slackware boxes any more) I'm not going to volunteer, either. However I've > been able to update the queue repository adding a sbo-14.0 branch with > queues generated from the REQUIRES directives. Since the process requires > much less manual intervention, if there's interest I think I'll be also > able to keep it up to date (where "up to date" means "less than two months > old" ;-)) > > Hope this will be good enough for most users. If not, please let me know. > -- > Mauro Giachero > > _______________________________________________ > SlackBuilds-users mailing list > SlackBuilds-users at slackbuilds.org > http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users > Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ > FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/ > > > Thank you to both Slackmagick and Mauro for your responses. I accept that the goals and development of sbopkg will remain in line with the Slackware philosophy and that having multiple potential unaffiliated queue file repos can be beneficial. Mauro, Thank you for the updates from the info files. I would like to assist with the queues, specifically adding the optional dependencies. Could I e-mail you patches for updates or will you be passing the ownership of the repo to an active slackware user? -- -Thank You, -Matthew Fillpot -Slackware Documentation Project - Staff Editor - http://docs.slackware.com/wiki:user:mfillpot -Linux.com - Moderator - https://www.linux.com/forums/person/198 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mauro.giachero at gmail.com Thu Oct 11 07:28:52 2012 From: mauro.giachero at gmail.com (Mauro Giachero) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:28:52 +0200 Subject: [sbopkg-users] [Slackbuilds-users] sbopkg and the README/.info files (REQUIRES line) In-Reply-To: References: <20121005185845.GA21782@devbox> <1349484072.52797.YahooMailNeo@web142306.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20121006014927.GA902@gmail.com> <20121006022626.GA27653@devbox> <20121008113454.cj7f898w0wsoog88@webmail.oulu.fi> <20121008220314.GA2486@devbox> Message-ID: On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Matthew Fillpot wrote: > [...] > Mauro, > Thank you for the updates from the info files. I would like to assist with > the queues, specifically adding the optional dependencies. Could I e-mail > you patches for updates or will you be passing the ownership of the repo to > an active slackware user? > My current plan is to keep the master/sbo-14.0 branches strictly based on the REQUIRES directive. However I can set up master-contrib/sbo-14.0-contrib branches where other changes can take place. So you can try sending patches, let's see whether I'll manage to push them. Further messages on the topic should be sent off-list, I think. > -- > -Thank You, > -Matthew Fillpot > Bye -- Mauro Giachero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arthura at q.com Tue Oct 30 00:21:28 2012 From: arthura at q.com (Arthur) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:21:28 -0700 Subject: [sbopkg-users] perl-gtk2 problem Message-ID: <508F1D88.9040902@q.com> Hi Nice Folks, I'm trying to install dvdrip but I'm getting stuck on perl-gtk2, it looks like this: Test Summary Report ------------------- t/GtkCellRenderer.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 26 Failed: 1) Failed test: 23 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=229, Tests=5082, 19 wallclock secs ( 0.71 usr 0.11 sys + 14.65 cusr 1.47 csys = 16.94 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/229 test programs. 1/5082 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 Here are some more lines that may be relevant: GLib-WARNING **: (gerror.c:390):g_error_new_valist: runtime check failed: (domain != 0) at t/GtkTextBufferRichText.t line 210, line 1. Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_window_get_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_drag_set_icon_pixmap: assertion `!mask || gdk_window_get_screen (mask) == screen' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. # Failed test 'callbacks encountered' # at t/GtkCellRenderer.t line 253. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->[2] = 'size' # $expected->[2] = 'render' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 26. GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: Object class EditableTest doesn't implement property 'editing-canceled' from interface 'GtkCellEditable' at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/Glib/Object/Subclass.pm line 233. Can anyone help me understand this? Thanks From arthura at q.com Tue Oct 30 01:10:04 2012 From: arthura at q.com (Arthur) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:10:04 -0700 Subject: [sbopkg-users] bombono-dvd problem Message-ID: <508F28EC.6070505@q.com> Hi All, Well I got all of the dependencies installed but when I try to build bombono-dvd I get: bombono-dvd.SlackBuild.build: line 77: /var/lib/sbopkg/SBo/14.0/multimedia/bombono-dvd/bombono-dvd-1.2.0-cdrtools.patch: No such file or directory Maybe this line is from a previous build? Can I just comment it out? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks From binhvng at gmail.com Tue Oct 30 06:27:09 2012 From: binhvng at gmail.com (Binh Nguyen) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:27:09 +0700 Subject: [sbopkg-users] perl-gtk2 problem In-Reply-To: <508F1D88.9040902@q.com> References: <508F1D88.9040902@q.com> Message-ID: <20121030062709.GA21085@gmail.com> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 at 05:21 PM -0700, Arthur wrote: > Hi Nice Folks, > > I'm trying to install dvdrip but I'm getting stuck on perl-gtk2, it > looks like this: > [..] > > Here are some more lines that may be relevant: > > GLib-WARNING **: (gerror.c:390):g_error_new_valist: runtime check > failed: (domain != 0) at t/GtkTextBufferRichText.t line 210, > line 1. > > Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_window_get_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW > (window)' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. > Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_drag_set_icon_pixmap: assertion `!mask || > gdk_window_get_screen (mask) == screen' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. > > # Failed test 'callbacks encountered' > # at t/GtkCellRenderer.t line 253. > # Structures begin differing at: > # $got->[2] = 'size' > # $expected->[2] = 'render' > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 26. > [..] > Can anyone help me understand this? What version of Slackware/sbopkg/repo did you use? >From the build output I guess the fail was because you were not running the SlackBuild on an xterm. Can you confirm this? The last solution is disabling the "make test" line in the SlackBuild. -- Binh From arthura at q.com Tue Oct 30 14:36:05 2012 From: arthura at q.com (Arthur) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:36:05 -0700 Subject: [sbopkg-users] perl-gtk2 problem In-Reply-To: <20121030062709.GA21085@gmail.com> References: <508F1D88.9040902@q.com> <20121030062709.GA21085@gmail.com> Message-ID: <508FE5D5.2060102@q.com> On 10/29/2012 11:27 PM, Binh Nguyen wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 at 05:21 PM -0700, Arthur wrote: > >> Hi Nice Folks, >> >> I'm trying to install dvdrip but I'm getting stuck on perl-gtk2, it >> looks like this: >> [..] >> >> Here are some more lines that may be relevant: >> >> GLib-WARNING **: (gerror.c:390):g_error_new_valist: runtime check >> failed: (domain != 0) at t/GtkTextBufferRichText.t line 210, >> line 1. >> >> Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_window_get_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW >> (window)' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. >> Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_drag_set_icon_pixmap: assertion `!mask || >> gdk_window_get_screen (mask) == screen' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. >> >> # Failed test 'callbacks encountered' >> # at t/GtkCellRenderer.t line 253. >> # Structures begin differing at: >> # $got->[2] = 'size' >> # $expected->[2] = 'render' >> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 26. >> [..] >> Can anyone help me understand this? >> > Thanks for your reply > What version of Slackware/sbopkg/repo did you use? > sbopkg is 0.36.0 and the slackware repo is 14.0 > > From the build output I guess the fail was because you were not running > the SlackBuild on an xterm. Can you confirm this? > I ran sbopkg on Terminal (the xfce terminal) using su - > The last solution is disabling the "make test" line in the SlackBuild. > Okay and thanks again! > -- Binh > _______________________________________________ > sbopkg-users mailing list > sbopkg-users at sbopkg.org > http://sbopkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sbopkg-users > > From chess at chessgriffin.com Tue Oct 30 15:54:26 2012 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:54:26 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] bombono-dvd problem In-Reply-To: <508F28EC.6070505@q.com> References: <508F28EC.6070505@q.com> Message-ID: <1351612466.17109.140661147330109.6C6EB972@webmail.messagingengine.com> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012, at 09:10 PM, Arthur wrote: > Hi All, > > Well I got all of the dependencies installed but when I try to build > bombono-dvd I get: > > bombono-dvd.SlackBuild.build: line 77: > /var/lib/sbopkg/SBo/14.0/multimedia/bombono-dvd/bombono-dvd-1.2.0-cdrtools.patch: > No such file or directory > > Maybe this line is from a previous build? Can I just comment it out? > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > It does look like it's a leftover line from an earlier version of the SlackBuild script, but regardless it's something that should really be addressed to the maintainer of the script at SBo. It's not an sbopkg issue. -- Chess Griffin From chess at chessgriffin.com Tue Oct 30 18:05:14 2012 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:05:14 -0400 Subject: [sbopkg-users] perl-gtk2 problem In-Reply-To: <508FE5D5.2060102@q.com> References: <508F1D88.9040902@q.com> <20121030062709.GA21085@gmail.com> <508FE5D5.2060102@q.com> Message-ID: <1351620314.29502.140661147386605.338FAE05@webmail.messagingengine.com> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Arthur wrote: > On 10/29/2012 11:27 PM, Binh Nguyen wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 at 05:21 PM -0700, Arthur wrote: > > > >> Hi Nice Folks, > >> > >> I'm trying to install dvdrip but I'm getting stuck on perl-gtk2, it > >> looks like this: > >> [..] > >> > >> Here are some more lines that may be relevant: > >> > >> GLib-WARNING **: (gerror.c:390):g_error_new_valist: runtime check > >> failed: (domain != 0) at t/GtkTextBufferRichText.t line 210, > >> line 1. > >> > >> Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_window_get_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW > >> (window)' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. > >> Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_drag_set_icon_pixmap: assertion `!mask || > >> gdk_window_get_screen (mask) == screen' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. > >> > >> # Failed test 'callbacks encountered' > >> # at t/GtkCellRenderer.t line 253. > >> # Structures begin differing at: > >> # $got->[2] = 'size' > >> # $expected->[2] = 'render' > >> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 26. > >> [..] > >> Can anyone help me understand this? > >> > > > Thanks for your reply > > What version of Slackware/sbopkg/repo did you use? > > > sbopkg is 0.36.0 and the slackware repo is 14.0 > > > From the build output I guess the fail was because you were not running > > the SlackBuild on an xterm. Can you confirm this? > > > I ran sbopkg on Terminal (the xfce terminal) using su - > > The last solution is disabling the "make test" line in the SlackBuild. > > > Okay and thanks again! > > > -- Binh I'm not sure this is an sbopkg issue. You could try running the SlackBuild outside of sbopkg to see if that works. -- Chess Griffin From arthura at q.com Tue Oct 30 20:36:06 2012 From: arthura at q.com (Arthur) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:36:06 -0700 Subject: [sbopkg-users] perl-gtk2 problem In-Reply-To: <1351620314.29502.140661147386605.338FAE05@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <508F1D88.9040902@q.com> <20121030062709.GA21085@gmail.com> <508FE5D5.2060102@q.com> <1351620314.29502.140661147386605.338FAE05@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <50903A36.90400@q.com> On 10/30/2012 11:05 AM, Chess Griffin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Arthur wrote: > >> On 10/29/2012 11:27 PM, Binh Nguyen wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 at 05:21 PM -0700, Arthur wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Nice Folks, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to install dvdrip but I'm getting stuck on perl-gtk2, it >>>> looks like this: >>>> [..] >>>> >>>> Here are some more lines that may be relevant: >>>> >>>> GLib-WARNING **: (gerror.c:390):g_error_new_valist: runtime check >>>> failed: (domain != 0) at t/GtkTextBufferRichText.t line 210, >>>> line 1. >>>> >>>> Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_window_get_screen: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW >>>> (window)' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. >>>> Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_drag_set_icon_pixmap: assertion `!mask || >>>> gdk_window_get_screen (mask) == screen' failed at t/GtkDnd.t line 55. >>>> >>>> # Failed test 'callbacks encountered' >>>> # at t/GtkCellRenderer.t line 253. >>>> # Structures begin differing at: >>>> # $got->[2] = 'size' >>>> # $expected->[2] = 'render' >>>> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 26. >>>> [..] >>>> Can anyone help me understand this? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> Thanks for your reply >> >>> What version of Slackware/sbopkg/repo did you use? >>> >>> >> sbopkg is 0.36.0 and the slackware repo is 14.0 >> >>>> From the build output I guess the fail was because you were not running >>>> >>> the SlackBuild on an xterm. Can you confirm this? >>> >>> >> I ran sbopkg on Terminal (the xfce terminal) using su - >> >>> The last solution is disabling the "make test" line in the SlackBuild. >>> >>> >> Okay and thanks again! >> >> >>> -- Binh >>> > I'm not sure this is an sbopkg issue. You could try running the > SlackBuild outside of sbopkg to see if that works. > > Thanks again, this is the same reply as my issue with bombono-dvd. I'm quite a novice with slackware and so it seems that I should be addressing these questions to the SlackBuild maintainers rather than this mailing list. Thanks again to both of you for pointing this out.