From me at alkos333.net Mon Jan 18 19:08:50 2010 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:08:50 -0600 Subject: [sbopkg-users] Obsolete Source Utility Message-ID: Are the sources of the packages that aren't currently installed considered obsolete? -- Alex Lysenka Bachelor of Computer Science Operations Management & Information Systems Major Northern Illinois University alysenka at niu.edu From chess at chessgriffin.com Tue Jan 19 03:54:49 2010 From: chess at chessgriffin.com (Chess Griffin) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:54:49 -0500 Subject: [sbopkg-users] Obsolete Source Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8682df161001181954u7ac939b1g535a2af4a2954226@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:08 PM, alkos333 wrote: > Are the sources of the packages that aren't currently installed > considered obsolete? > Alex, I'm not at my box to be able to check, but IIRC, the function compares cached sources against the current source of all packages, not just the installed ones. -- Chess Griffin From me at alkos333.net Tue Jan 19 06:43:39 2010 From: me at alkos333.net (alkos333) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:43:39 -0600 Subject: [sbopkg-users] Obsolete Source Utility In-Reply-To: <8682df161001181954u7ac939b1g535a2af4a2954226@mail.gmail.com> References: <8682df161001181954u7ac939b1g535a2af4a2954226@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Chess Griffin wrote: > Alex, I'm not at my box to be able to check, but IIRC, the function > compares cached sources against the current source of all packages, > not just the installed ones. I guess I should have checked the source before asking. Sorry about that. -- Alex Lysenka Bachelor of Computer Science Operations Management & Information Systems Major Northern Illinois University alysenka at niu.edu From dave at unrealize.co.uk Sun Jan 31 17:39:50 2010 From: dave at unrealize.co.uk (David Woodfall) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:39:50 +0000 Subject: [sbopkg-users] Chrome problem Message-ID: <20100131173949.GA6605@Junius> I noticed that building chrome gets stuck in a loop with sbopkg. Slackbuild works fine though. D -- Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: From slakmagik at gmail.com Sun Jan 31 21:28:38 2010 From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:28:38 -0500 Subject: [sbopkg-users] Chrome problem In-Reply-To: <20100131173949.GA6605@Junius> References: <20100131173949.GA6605@Junius> Message-ID: <20100131212838.GA24928@surfbox> On 2010-01-31 (Sun) 17:39:50 [+0000], David Woodfall wrote: > I noticed that building chrome gets stuck in a loop with sbopkg. > Slackbuild works fine though. > I can't reproduce this. Using both trunk (build) and 0.31.1 (build, install, uninstall), sbopkg worked fine for me (except for an md5sum mismatch). Can you say what version of sbopkg, version of slackware, arch of machine, what part exactly is looping, or any other sort of detail? From dave at unrealize.co.uk Sun Jan 31 21:41:31 2010 From: dave at unrealize.co.uk (David Woodfall) Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:41:31 +0000 Subject: [sbopkg-users] Chrome problem In-Reply-To: <20100131212838.GA24928@surfbox> References: <20100131173949.GA6605@Junius> <20100131212838.GA24928@surfbox> Message-ID: <20100131214131.GA3901@Junius> On (16:28 31/01/10), slakmagik put forth the proposition: >On 2010-01-31 (Sun) 17:39:50 [+0000], David Woodfall wrote: >> I noticed that building chrome gets stuck in a loop with sbopkg. >> Slackbuild works fine though. >> Strange, it now works but I do get a checksum fail. > >I can't reproduce this. Using both trunk (build) and 0.31.1 (build, >install, uninstall), sbopkg worked fine for me (except for an md5sum >mismatch). Can you say what version of sbopkg, version of slackware, >arch of machine, what part exactly is looping, or any other sort of >detail? Slackware 13 sbopkg 0.31.1 Don't recall the exact loop but it looked like it was needing some input. >_______________________________________________ >sbopkg-users mailing list >sbopkg-users at sbopkg.org >http://sbopkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sbopkg-users -- Don't look back, the lemmings are gaining on you. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: