[sbopkg-discuss] Re: feature idea

[Chess Griffin]

* uSlacker <gregmartin1 at gmail.com> [2009-01-01 09:27:55]:

> 
> Chess, great tool, been using it for awhile, but really got into it
> since 12.2.  Did all my sbo package upgrades this way.  I have a
> thought, let me know if this has been discussed.  currently sbopkg
> only support a single instance.  I understand that given some of the
> database-like functionality.  Would it be possible for the -b option
> to NOT require single-instance?
> 
> Obviously I don't understand the internals, but "intuitively" it seems
> possible.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> \\Greg

Greg,

Thanks for the kind words and I am glad sbopkg has been working well
for you.  As for your feature request, do you mean having more than
one instance of sbopkg running so you could build (using -b) more than
one package at a time?  If so, this might be possible -- I've added it
to my TODO list to think about.

Thanks for the feedback and Happy New Year!

-- 
Chess Griffin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20090101/d27209cc/attachment.sig>