[sbopkg-discuss] Re: feature idea

[gmartin]

Chess, that's what I'm interested concurrent builds. As luck would
have it, I dl'd .20 and found the build queue. It worked very well.

Keep up the good work.Happy New Year

On 1/1/09, Chess Griffin <chess at chessgriffin.com> wrote:
> * uSlacker <gregmartin1 at gmail.com> [2009-01-01 09:27:55]:
>
>>
>> Chess, great tool, been using it for awhile, but really got into it
>> since 12.2.  Did all my sbo package upgrades this way.  I have a
>> thought, let me know if this has been discussed.  currently sbopkg
>> only support a single instance.  I understand that given some of the
>> database-like functionality.  Would it be possible for the -b option
>> to NOT require single-instance?
>>
>> Obviously I don't understand the internals, but "intuitively" it seems
>> possible.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> \\Greg
>
> Greg,
>
> Thanks for the kind words and I am glad sbopkg has been working well
> for you.  As for your feature request, do you mean having more than
> one instance of sbopkg running so you could build (using -b) more than
> one package at a time?  If so, this might be possible -- I've added it
> to my TODO list to think about.
>
> Thanks for the feedback and Happy New Year!
>
> --
> Chess Griffin
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sbopkg-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to sbopkg-discuss at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sbopkg-discuss+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sbopkg-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---