From sftp.mtuci at gmail.com  Fri Jan  7 23:51:27 2011
From: sftp.mtuci at gmail.com (Sergey V.)
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 02:51:27 +0300
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
Message-ID: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>

Hello all!

Here is current version of bash completion script for sbopkg (attached).
Also actual version is available on github [1].

Any comments or suggestions are welcome.


regards, Sergey

[1] https://github.com/sftp/bash-completion/blob/sftp/completions/sbopkg
-------------- next part --------------
# -*- sh -*-
# bash completion for sbopkg tool
#
# (c) Igor Murzov <igor at gplsoft.org>
# (c) Sergey V. <sftp.mtuci at gmail.com>

have sbopkg &&
_sbopkg()
{
    COMPREPLY=()
    local cur prev
    _get_comp_words_by_ref cur prev

    if [[ "$cur" == -* ]]; then
        COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W '-b -c -d -e -f -g -h -i -k -l \
                      -o -P -p -q -R -r -s -u -V -v' -- "$cur" ) )
        return 0
    fi

    case $prev in
        -e)
            COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W 'ask continue stop' -- "$cur" ) )
            return 0
            ;;
        -f)
            _filedir
            return 0
            ;;
        -d)
            _filedir -d
            return 0
            ;;
        -V)
            COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "? \
                `sbopkg -V ? 2>&1 | cut -s -f1`" -- "$cur" ) )
            return 0
            ;;
        -i|-b)
            ;;
        *)
            return 0
            ;;
    esac

    local config="/etc/sbopkg/sbopkg.conf"
    local words
    _get_comp_words_by_ref words

    for (( i=${#words[@]}-1; i>0; i-- )); do
        if [[ ${words[i]} == '-f' ]]; then
            config="${words[i+1]}"
            break
        fi
    done

    if [ ! -r "$config" ]; then
        return 0
    fi

    . $config

    for (( i=1; i<${#words[@]}; i++ )); do
        case "${words[i]}" in
            '-V')
                REPO_NAME="${words[i+1]%%/*}"
                REPO_BRANCH="${words[i+1]#*/}"
                ;;
            '-d')
                REPO_ROOT="${words[i+1]}"
                ;;
        esac
    done

    if [ ! -r "$REPO_ROOT/$REPO_NAME/$REPO_BRANCH/SLACKBUILDS.TXT" ]; then
        return 0
    fi
    COMPREPLY=( $( grep "^SLACKBUILD NAME: $cur" \
        $REPO_ROOT/$REPO_NAME/$REPO_BRANCH/SLACKBUILDS.TXT | cut -f3- -d\  )
        $( (cd $QUEUEDIR; ls $cur*.sqf 2> /dev/null) ) )
    return 0

} && complete -F _sbopkg sbopkg -o plusdirs

From slakmagik at gmail.com  Sat Jan  8 03:05:40 2011
From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 22:05:40 -0500
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
In-Reply-To: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
References: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110108030540.GA10051@devbox>

On 2011-01-08 (Sat) 02:51:27 [+0300], Sergey V. wrote:
> Hello all!
> 
> Here is current version of bash completion script for sbopkg (attached).
> Also actual version is available on github [1].
> 
> Any comments or suggestions are welcome.
> 

Thanks for this contribution, but you need to either import have() from
the main script or drop it and similarly with _get_comp_words_by_ref()
and _filedir (and the functions those functions call, etc.). I'd prefer
junking as much as possible from the main script to keep the part broken
out for sbopkg as small and simple as possible. For instance, _filedir
seems to try to rewrite a simple 'compgen -f' just for filenames with
spaces. But whatever makes it work. That's all I see right off, as I
haven't looked at it very closely yet.

From rw at rlworkman.net  Sat Jan  8 03:26:14 2011
From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 21:26:14 -0600
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
In-Reply-To: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
References: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110107212614.03ba3eec@liberty>

On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 02:51:27 +0300
"Sergey V." <sftp.mtuci at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all!
> 
> Here is current version of bash completion script for sbopkg
> (attached). Also actual version is available on github [1].
> 
> Any comments or suggestions are welcome.
> 
> 
> regards, Sergey
> 
> [1]
> https://github.com/sftp/bash-completion/blob/sftp/completions/sbopkg


I've been meaning to do this myself, but I can't seem to find
the time, so I'll make a shameless request: any chance you
would be willing to do some bash completion magic for slackpkg
too?  :-)

-RW

From sftp.mtuci at gmail.com  Sun Jan  9 00:22:05 2011
From: sftp.mtuci at gmail.com (Sergey V.)
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 03:22:05 +0300
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
In-Reply-To: <20110108030540.GA10051@devbox>
References: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
	<20110108030540.GA10051@devbox>
Message-ID: <201101090322.06214.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>

On Saturday 08 of January 2011 06:05:40 slakmagik wrote:

> Thanks for this contribution, but you need to either import have() from
> the main script or drop it and similarly with _get_comp_words_by_ref()
> and _filedir (and the functions those functions call, etc.). I'd prefer
> junking as much as possible from the main script to keep the part broken
> out for sbopkg as small and simple as possible. For instance, _filedir
> seems to try to rewrite a simple 'compgen -f' just for filenames with
> spaces. But whatever makes it work. That's all I see right off, as I
> haven't looked at it very closely yet.

Sorry, forgot to say, sbopkg completion script written for bash-completion-1.2 
or above (slackbuild attached).

have(), _get_comp_words_by_ref() and _filedir is builtin functions of bash-
completion-1.2.

We can't just s/_filedir/compgen -f/, it will does not works.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bash-completion-slackbuild.tar.gz
Type: application/x-compressed-tar
Size: 4832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20110109/2017f999/attachment.bin>

From slakmagik at gmail.com  Sun Jan  9 02:46:42 2011
From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik)
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:46:42 -0500
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
In-Reply-To: <201101090322.06214.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
References: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
	<20110108030540.GA10051@devbox>
	<201101090322.06214.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110109024642.GA30920@devbox>

On 2011-01-09 (Sun) 03:22:05 [+0300], Sergey V. wrote:
> On Saturday 08 of January 2011 06:05:40 slakmagik wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for this contribution, but you need to either import have() from
> > the main script or drop it and similarly with _get_comp_words_by_ref()
> > and _filedir (and the functions those functions call, etc.). I'd prefer
> > junking as much as possible from the main script to keep the part broken
> > out for sbopkg as small and simple as possible. For instance, _filedir
> > seems to try to rewrite a simple 'compgen -f' just for filenames with
> > spaces. But whatever makes it work. That's all I see right off, as I
> > haven't looked at it very closely yet.
> 
> Sorry, forgot to say, sbopkg completion script written for bash-completion-1.2 
> or above (slackbuild attached).
> 
> have(), _get_comp_words_by_ref() and _filedir is builtin functions of bash-
> completion-1.2.
> 

I know. So it looks like we had some miscommunication in #sbopkg. I
don't see the point of this. If someone wants to install
bash_completion, then they do so and they get sbopkg completions. And
that's that package; not sbopkg. What I thought you were offering was a
simple, independent, self-contained file such as the git or mercurial
completion files. Something like that would be nice to include in
sbopkg. But I don't want a file in sbopkg that doesn't work unless you
install something else.

> We can't just s/_filedir/compgen -f/, it will does not works.

Yeah, I didn't figure it would - I just meant that bash-completion-1.2
seems to include overhead that could be reduced for simple sbopkg
completion.

From igor at gplsoft.org  Sun Jan  9 02:54:29 2011
From: igor at gplsoft.org (Igor Murzov)
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 05:54:29 +0300
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
In-Reply-To: <20110107212614.03ba3eec@liberty>
References: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
	<20110107212614.03ba3eec@liberty>
Message-ID: <201101090554.30093.igor@gplsoft.org>

Hi, Robby

> I've been meaning to do this myself, but I can't seem to find
> the time, so I'll make a shameless request: any chance you
> would be willing to do some bash completion magic for slackpkg
> too?  :-)

As neither Sergey, nor I actually use slackpkg, we made some investigations in 
how the slackpkg actually works and prepared initial completion script. You 
can find it here:
https://github.com/GArik/bash-completion/raw/slackpkg/completions/slackpkg

Please test it thoroughly. Any comments and suggestions are welcome, 
especially regarding patterns magic: "FILE  is a file with a list of PATTERNs 
inside". May be you could show us some examples of right usage of slackpkgs 
options, so we'll have some test cases.

Regards,
-- Igor

From jh-gilmour at bigpond.com  Wed Jan 12 05:24:02 2011
From: jh-gilmour at bigpond.com (James&Helen)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:24:02 +1100
Subject: [sbopkg-users] Help wanted to run sbopkg
Message-ID: <4D2D3AF2.1010505@bigpond.com>

       It's been a while since I last used *sbopkg* and I've forgotten 
how to open it!!.
         It's still in ~/Downloads/usr/*sbopkg but I can't get into it 
from a terminal or a desktop.
         Can some kind person help this one to cross the road?

-- 
James&Helen


From slava18 at gmail.com  Wed Jan 12 07:49:17 2011
From: slava18 at gmail.com (V'yacheslav Stetskevych)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:49:17 +0200
Subject: [sbopkg-users] Help wanted to run sbopkg
In-Reply-To: <4D2D3AF2.1010505@bigpond.com>
References: <4D2D3AF2.1010505@bigpond.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTim0+GuVPE+LymcyYR55hF7uHR+_HH7H0gK2T-k2@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:24 AM, James&Helen <jh-gilmour at bigpond.com> wrote:
> ? ? ?It's been a while since I last used *sbopkg* and I've forgotten how to
> open it!!.
> ? ? ? ?It's still in ~/Downloads/usr/*sbopkg but I can't get into it from a
> terminal or a desktop.
> ? ? ? ?Can some kind person help this one to cross the road?

Step 0: I don't know how you have sbopkg installed, so you might want
to go to http://sbopkg.org/ and download the latest Package (a green
link on the right side of the page).
Step 1: Open a terminal, become root by issuing "su -", then install
the downloaded package by running "upgradepkg --install-new
--reinstall /path/to/your/sbopkg-...-.tgz".
Step 2: Stay in the root shell, run "sbopkg" and follow the prompts.

That is all.
Have fun.

- V'yacheslav.

-- 
If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo,
then Linux is Dolby Digital and all the music is free...
? ? ? ?http://www.linux.com

From schultzter at gmail.com  Wed Jan 12 20:18:56 2011
From: schultzter at gmail.com (Eric Schultz)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:18:56 -0500
Subject: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg available on slackbuilds.org?!
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=idO9aXidaYzg+1s+HxiLiEFkMNTxspruKLcL9@mail.gmail.com>

I've checked through this list's archives (mostly just the titles, read a
few interesting threads) and didn't find an answer to this question:  why
isn't sbopkg available from slackbuilds.org?  Isn't it ironic that isn't?

If sbopkg was part of slackbuild's repository then checking for a new
version of sbopkg would be inherent in checking for slackbuild.org udpates.
 It would be one less step.

Just my $0.02.  Thanks,

<http://about.me/schultzter>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20110112/d2723f76/attachment.htm>

From mauro.giachero at gmail.com  Wed Jan 12 21:51:02 2011
From: mauro.giachero at gmail.com (Mauro Giachero)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:51:02 +0100
Subject: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg available on slackbuilds.org?!
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinX5dGDsc4qAUUAbnjOrXiN3VH3E9p_r5CVMH0y@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=idO9aXidaYzg+1s+HxiLiEFkMNTxspruKLcL9@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinX5dGDsc4qAUUAbnjOrXiN3VH3E9p_r5CVMH0y@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTin=MniPg5pdOGPU0EbWV_u86-evE1ucHUm3=feR@mail.gmail.com>

I also thought that some time ago.
The greatest problem would be to manage sbopkg upgrading itself, since you
can't simply replace the script while it's running. That issue itself is
IMHO a big can of worms, so I decided to simply keep the sbopkg upgrade
something users will have to perform manually outside sbopkg.
Of course patches are always welcome :-)
--
Mauro Giachero
Sent from my Android phone

Il giorno 12/gen/2011 21:19, "Eric Schultz" <schultzter at gmail.com> ha
scritto:

I've checked through this list's archives (mostly just the titles, read a
few interesting threads) and didn't find an answer to this question:  why
isn't sbopkg available from slackbuilds.org?  Isn't it ironic that isn't?

If sbopkg was part of slackbuild's repository then checking for a new
version of sbopkg would be inherent in checking for slackbuild.org udpates.
 It would be one less step.

Just my $0.02.  Thanks,

<http://about.me/schultzter>


_______________________________________________
sbopkg-users mailing list
sbopkg-users at sbopkg.org
http://sbopkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sbopkg-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20110112/79bc9cd9/attachment.htm>

From rw at rlworkman.net  Mon Jan 17 19:53:37 2011
From: rw at rlworkman.net (Robby Workman)
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:53:37 -0600
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
In-Reply-To: <201101090554.30093.igor@gplsoft.org>
References: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
	<20110107212614.03ba3eec@liberty>
	<201101090554.30093.igor@gplsoft.org>
Message-ID: <20110117135337.4ffe8ed6@liberty>

On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 05:54:29 +0300
Igor Murzov <igor at gplsoft.org> wrote:

> Hi, Robby
> 
> > I've been meaning to do this myself, but I can't seem to find
> > the time, so I'll make a shameless request: any chance you
> > would be willing to do some bash completion magic for slackpkg
> > too?  :-)
> 
> As neither Sergey, nor I actually use slackpkg, we made some
> investigations in how the slackpkg actually works and prepared
> initial completion script. You can find it here:
> https://github.com/GArik/bash-completion/raw/slackpkg/completions/slackpkg


Oooh, very nice - thanks, Igor.  I'm CC'ing PiterPUNK (author of
slackpkg) on this so that he can see too.


> Please test it thoroughly. Any comments and suggestions are welcome, 
> especially regarding patterns magic: "FILE  is a file with a list of
> PATTERNs inside". May be you could show us some examples of right
> usage of slackpkgs options, so we'll have some test cases.


I don't think I'd worry too much about the FILE usage - I've never
used that, and I don't know anyone who has.  PiterPUNK, what's 
your take on that?

I've got this installed now, so give me some time to play around
and we'll go from there.

-RW

From piterpunk at slackware.com  Fri Jan 21 04:07:42 2011
From: piterpunk at slackware.com (Piter PUNK)
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:07:42 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash completion
In-Reply-To: <20110117135337.4ffe8ed6@liberty>
References: <201101080251.27851.sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
	<20110107212614.03ba3eec@liberty>
	<201101090554.30093.igor@gplsoft.org>
	<20110117135337.4ffe8ed6@liberty>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101201958570.16680@connie.slackware.com>



On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Robby Workman wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 05:54:29 +0300
> Igor Murzov <igor at gplsoft.org> wrote:
>>
>> As neither Sergey, nor I actually use slackpkg, we made some
>> investigations in how the slackpkg actually works and prepared
>> initial completion script. You can find it here:
>> https://github.com/GArik/bash-completion/raw/slackpkg/completions/slackpkg

Very nice! I am very happy with that! Can I put it inside slackpkg
under "docs" directory? Or are you sending it to upstream?

>> Please test it thoroughly. Any comments and suggestions are welcome,
>> especially regarding patterns magic: "FILE  is a file with a list of
>> PATTERNs inside". May be you could show us some examples of right
>> usage of slackpkgs options, so we'll have some test cases.

You can create /some/path/to/FILE and, inside FILE put any acceptable
PATTERN there, separated by spaces:

root at kitt:~# cat /tmp/FILE
xorg glibc
d

If I run:

slackpkg reinstall /tmp/FILE

It will be the same of:

slackpkg reinstall xorg glibc d

Which will reinstall all packages with xorg[-something], glibc[-something]
and entire development (d) series.

This helps?

If needs anything else, feel free to contact me.

Piter PUNK

From Bradley at NorthTech.US  Tue Jan 25 19:15:15 2011
From: Bradley at NorthTech.US (Bradley D. Thornton)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:15:15 -0800
Subject: [sbopkg-users] checking for updates and installing new package...
Message-ID: <4D3F2143.9060004@NorthTech.US>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

I was just reading the thread about why sbopkg isn't at sbo LOL!

sbopkg will, however, check (and d/l?) the latest version and then all
the user would have to do is upgradepkg, presumably - is this correct?.

Or perhaps a hack to slackpkg to get it (after all, that would indeed
occur outside of sbopkg).

Interesting.


- -- 
Bradley D. Thornton
Manager Network Services
NorthTech Computer
TEL: +1.760.666.2703  (US)
TEL: +44.702.405.1909 (UK)
http://NorthTech.US

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Find this cert at x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

iQEcBAEBAwAGBQJNPyFDAAoJEE1wgkIhr9j3AUkH/RbHtL1r5SU1NHTpZpi48+Vw
zmosTFzEU654eUFiYCE2yR1HbCY9kIDR7Ks5M8Llg3K/2BTpwb6IayzZstW1ljwg
3lBWjQkWVIZ2VJPnvkfa5I89xAG86oCe2ioUjAvXYFMn2nrl21r0NVHp+7O7Uwzz
EEUU/zwTL5ZxA3OKuLcDpnaCQnT/uXDPPNDGukoxHRqt6PMCRMOGzmGWHKbL+W0h
0OWUSoqnk/aNo12S+so189yBo+FPPl2tAswXRR3BO5hqASh3SC6S5tw0fV4T3cQi
H4s+NX7vq0U4L0TnXVUFgBRyTmyojyr7EhklfocXXAxiT/3Kj4E8I32YX8rTVX4=
=XfNx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From slakmagik at gmail.com  Tue Jan 25 20:48:04 2011
From: slakmagik at gmail.com (slakmagik)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:48:04 -0500
Subject: [sbopkg-users] checking for updates and installing
	new	package...
In-Reply-To: <4D3F2143.9060004@NorthTech.US>
References: <4D3F2143.9060004@NorthTech.US>
Message-ID: <20110125204804.GA307@devbox>

On 2011-01-25 (Tue) 11:15:15 [-0800], Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> I was just reading the thread about why sbopkg isn't at sbo LOL!
> 
> sbopkg will, however, check (and d/l?) the latest version and then all
> the user would have to do is upgradepkg, presumably - is this correct?.
> 

Correct.

> Or perhaps a hack to slackpkg to get it (after all, that would indeed
> occur outside of sbopkg).
>

Since you're right about 'sbopkg -u', hacking slackpkg wouldn't get you
anything over that and wouldn't be the right direction anyway, as
slackpkg is for official Slackware packages and sbopkg isn't even an
official SBo package.

From intergalactic.anonymous at gmail.com  Fri Jan 28 16:56:46 2011
From: intergalactic.anonymous at gmail.com (Igor Murzov)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:56:46 +0300
Subject: [sbopkg-users] bash-completion
Message-ID: <201101281956.46633.e-mail@date.by>

> Very nice! I am very happy with that!

Here is updated version:

https://github.com/GArik/bash-completion/raw/slackware/completions/slackpkg

you can specify disk sets or filenames for 'install' and other actions.

> Can I put it inside slackpkg under "docs" directory?
> Or are you sending it to upstream?

Of course, you can do whatever you want with it )  I can try to contact 
mantainers of bash-completion and ask 'em to pull all slackware related 
completions.

But there is some known issues:
* Options for pkgtool are inaccurate.
* No version completion available for slapt-src.

I'll fix second issue someday ) But the first one requires patching pkgtools.
If you have some time, please review pkgtool script and man page.
In man page:
-----------------------------------------
--ignore_tagfiles
--source_mounted
--source_dir
-----------------------------------------

in /sbin/pkgtool:
-----------------------------------------
# Here, we read the list of arguments passed to the pkgtool script.
if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then # there are arguments to the command
 while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
  case "$1" in
...
  -source_mounted | --source-mounted)
   SOURCE_MOUNTED="always" ; shift 1 ;;
  -ignore_tagfiles | --ignore-tagfiles)
   ASK="never" ; shift 1 ;;
  -tagfile | --tagfile)
   USETAG=$2 ; shift 2 ;;
  -source_dir | --source_dir)
...
-----------------------------------------

You can see that there is '--ignore_tagfiles' and '--ignore-tagfiles',  '--
source_mounted' and '--source-mounted' in different places. It would be great 
if you'll fix this.

Another spotted issues with pkgtools:
* No *) case within while loop where options are parsed. As the result pkgtool 
goes to infinite loop if any unknown option supplied.
* rpm2txz fails to convert rpms if there is a space character in file path. 
(patches are attached -- one for rpm2tgz and one for makepkg)

Some issues with slackpkg-2.81.1:
* slackpkg search  mentioned twice in man page.
* slackpkg search|file-search  seems to not actually accept any filenames
  Maybe you meant that one can search for filenames with file-search, then you 
  should remove leading slash from filenames.
-----------------------------------------
??[ /usr/bin ] [ root at garik ]
??# slackpkg file-search $(readlink -f ../bin/cc | cut -c2-)

Looking for usr/bin/gcc-4.5.2 in package list. Please wait... DONE

The list below shows the packages that contains "usr/bin/gcc-4\.5\.2" file.

[ installed ] - gcc-4.5.2-i486-1

You can search specific packages using "slackpkg search package".

-----------------------------------------


-- Igor
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0010-Quote-package-names.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 941 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20110128/00708a49/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: makepkg.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 411 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sbopkg.org/pipermail/sbopkg-users/attachments/20110128/00708a49/attachment-0001.bin>